cfoimglogo

Visitors



Today: 22
Yesterday: 37
This Week: 169
Last Week: 250
This Month: 592
Last Month: 797
Total: 3106



Manila Bulletin

September 6, 2011 - WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY – HOW SAFE

E-mail Print PDF

WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY – HOW SAFE

September 6, 2011

By:  WILMA INVENTOR MIRANDA

 

We are constantly wired to something – cell phones, internet, cordless phones, etc.  We come to the office and we have wireless internet and these days most of us have 2 or 3 cell phones - we use cordless phones, wireless speakers, Bluetooth and what have you. At the end of the day, we go home and most of us have wireless internet at home, cordless phones and several cell phones for each member of the family.

Although the issue on the safety of the use of cell phones had died down since the U.S. National Cancer Institute declared them safe and since the stringent requirements of the U.S. Federal Commission (FCC) that manufacturers should not exceed the maximum 1.6 watts per kilogram specific absorption rate (SAR) before these phones can be sold to the public were implemented, still there were experts who warn on the safety concerns of cell phones.  They were asserting that the FCC safety declaration was generally based on specific absorption rate (SAR) level, or the rate at which our bodies absorb radiation.  In the website of FCC it defines SAR “as a measure of the rate of RF (radiofrequency) energy absorption by the body from the source being measured – in this case, a cell phone”. These independent researchers were saying that SAR only monitors thermal effects – meaning, if it’s not emitting harmful energy on your brain, it passes as safe.

But in the website www.earthcalm.com it’s surprising and alarming to note that “SAR levels aren’t even the most important issue”.   It’s not as important as the research that shows that it’s the non-thermal radiation from a cell phone (the energy waves that made it possible for cell phones to connect to the cell towers) that “can damage our immune system and alter cellular functioning”.  This has nothing to do with how high or low the SAR level of your phone is. All cell phones emit a hazardous amount of non-thermal radiation.

The sad thing is that most of us are still ignorant about this fact on non-thermal radiation.  All we are concerned are the SAR which is the one much publicized.

.

 

Moreover, these safety studies on cell phones involved adults aged 18 or older.  Working parents especially gave their children cell phones to closely monitor their activities in school and whereabouts.  Other countries discourages children from using cell phones such as the British government when in December 2000 recommended reducing the length of time children spend on a cell phone.

 

If we cannot do anything much with RFs in offices, we can do something in minimizing our exposure at home not only with regards to cell phones but to anything wireless such as the internet.  At our home, we have this router in the master’s bedroom right beside our bed – now we plan to place it in our office room.  Where before, the router is turned on the whole night until morning, now we make sure it is turned off at night and when not online.

 

With cell phones, let’s try to use speakerphones when at home or in the car or use corded headphones and shy away from wireless headset.  Let’s also make sure to turn off to wireless mode our cell phones and IPADs when not going online.  Cordless phones should also be avoided if possible, since it can prove more harmful than a cell phone.  The phone base is like a mini cell tower radiating 24/7 at a range of up to 300 feet.

 

Technology is progressing day by day so we should make the most of technology to our advantage rather than be slave to it to the point of sacrificing our health.

 

(Wilma Miranda is the Chairperson of FINEX Publications Committee.  For comments, please email at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it ).

 

August 04, 2011 RISK AWARENESS FOR EVERYONE

E-mail Print PDF

BUSINESS OPTIONS

August 04, 2011

RISK AWARENESS FOR EVERYONE

 
 

By Flor G. Tarriela

 

When clients entrust their money with the bank, this means the money IS safe no matter what happens.  We cannot make the excuse that there was a storm which flooded our vaults on the 3rd floor hence we lost all the records of your money.  Or that there was a fire which burned the computers which started from a lightning which struck the coconut tree half a kilometer away. 

Risk management is what your bank does to protect the assets you have entrusted to us from events that have not yet occurred but may occur

Risk management is about:  (a) listing down the risks that can occur, (b) prioritizing which risks to be protected against given our limited means, and (c) doing the measures that will minimize the adverse effects if the risk occurs. 

RISK IDENTIFICATION

Pause for a moment to list down what are the possible bad things that can occur.  Write it down; be as paranoid as you can.  The airplane’s engine will fall and hit the building where the data center is housed.  A tornado will pull away the roof of the branch and the contents of the vault will fly away (do we have tornadoes in the Philippines?).  A risk is an event that has not yet occurred but can occur; we cannot prevent a risk, we can only mitigate its adverse effects If the problem already exists, it is not a risk, it is a weakness.

The bank buys Treasury Bills and other similar instruments for reselling to its clients.  The risk is that the market prices for these instruments will go down and the bank will lose money because it cannot recover its cost.  This has not yet occurred; this is Market Risk.  Market Risk is defined as the negative effect on the value of the asset due to changes in market / economic conditions - interest rates, foreign exchange rates.

Another example is that of a husband borrowing money from the bank to purchase a house He has a good record, he always pays his credit cards on time, is respected in his neighborhood; has been in his job for several years.  He has good “character”—the first C in the 5 Cs of credit. The other “C”s are:  Collateral, Capacity to pay, Capital, and Conditions.  We expect that he will pay the loan amortization on time.  But what if he loses his job, he gets sick and is disabled, dies of a heart attack (heaven forbid), or starts to play around and has a mistress, overspends, drinks all night, goes to casinos and loses money.  This has not occurred but can occur; it is Credit Risk Credit Risk is defined as the negative effect on the value of the credit asset due to unforeseen events in the paying capacity of the borrower.

Other risks that a financial institution may be exposed to are as follow (among others):

Liquidity Risk – the negative effect on the value of the asset because of the bank’s inability to liquefy its holdings

Funding Risk – the risk that the bank is unable to meet its obligations when they are due

Operational Risk - the negative effect on the bank’s earnings due to business disruptions, internal and/or external fraud, and / or the overall inability of the bank to deliver products & services

Reputation Risk – the negative impact on the bank’s overall earnings and / or destruction of shareholder value due to a negative public opinion, hence affecting the bank’s overall trustworthiness

Compliance Risk – the current and prospective risk to earnings or capital arising from violations of, or nonconformance with, laws, rules, regulations, prescribed practices, internal policies, and procedures, or ethical standards

 


 

RISK PRIORITIZATION

List the risks and order them from possible to nearly unlikely.  Then order them again by magnitude of adverse effect.  Those of us who did not fall asleep during Statistics class will have an “aha” moment remembering that probability x magnitude of effect = expected value. 

But how do we give a probability to an event that has not yet occurred?   If the risk is possible, give it, say 75% (more or less); if it is unlikely, give it a range of 1%-49%; if it can move either way, give it 50 - 50% likelihood. 

How do we measure the magnitude of effect?  Use money.  How much will we lose if the risk occurs?  How much do we have to spend to get back to normal if the risk occurs? How much should a financial institution spend to mitigate its risks?  An exercise in cost-benefit analysis needs to be done continuously.

For example:  A client who owns a digital shop (the one that sells laptops, computers, Macs) takes out a loan (P4,000,000) to expand his business. Client has good track record with the bank.  Pays on time, from previous loans; keeps the bank updated on the progress of his business.  But Client’s shop is located in a flood prone area.  The likelihood of the shop getting flooded is rare, so we give it a probability of say, 25%.  If the client’s digital shop is completely flooded, the client may lose say a quarter of his inventory and may have to replace all the furniture—say P1 million.  What then is the expected value of the risk?  25% x P1 million = P250 thousand.  The risk of being robbed is always present for a store.  Let us make the risk higher, say 50%.  But if the shop is robbed, chances are the robbers can only bring away half of the inventory and not destroy the furniture.  If half the inventory costs P1.5 million, the expected value of the risk is 50% x P1.5 million = P750 thousand. Lastly, a fire will be devastating.  It will destroy the entire shop.  The shop is in standalone building, well made, concrete.  The risk is low, say 25%.  The expected value of the risk is 25% x P4 million = P1 million.

Now that you have listed the risks and prioritized them by expected value, focus on those with highest expected value first.  We do not have an unlimited amount of money nor time.  There will be risks that we can address.  The rest we leave to prayer.

RISK MITIGATION

With the selected top 10 or top xx risks by expected value, plan what can be done to minimize the adverse effect.  Imagine that the risk has occurred, what could have been done earlier to minimize the “adverse effect” (I repeatedly use this term because it is the precise phrase).

Imagine the fire in the bank’s data center.  What are the risk mitigation measures that can minimize adverse effect?  We install a fire-suppressant gas system that would keep the effect of the fire to only a few devices, good.  Or we can choose to install a water sprinkler system which could be cheaper   and spend the money instead on a back-up data center and real-time copies of all their data.  This is Business Continuity Planning.  These life-changing risks have such a high expected value (probability x entire capital of the bank) that significant spend to mitigate risk is justified. 

Why is the “expected value” important as a concept?  If the bank is worth P10 billion and the probability of a fire in the data center is 5%, then spending P50 million for a back-up data center with all the software and equipment to do real-time recovery may be a fair exchange. 

How much money should we spend on RISK MITIGATION?

Companies should take time to identify all possible physical and morale risks that can occur.  We spend hundreds of hours at various levels of the organization – from head office staff to branch managers, officers, and staff – to identify, evaluate, and practice risk mitigation measures. Disaster recovery exercises where one branch is shut down and operates from another location is one of those mitigations to allow our customers to still work with the branch even if the building itself may be damaged. We invest equipment to minimize the adverse effect of a service interruption or data loss arising from the occurrence of a risk.

Carlette Pama,   PNB’s Risk Executive says,   “We spend a lot of money on training because facility and equipment alone will not work without practiced/experienced people who can provide the service even when the risk events occur.  They are not wasted effort or money just because the branch never gets flooded  Risk mitigation training is good for the soul. “

Does it stop here?  Noooo!  People change, clients change, the institution changes, market risks change, the environment changes.  We cannot afford to stop and depend on disaster-recovery plans created 5 years ago and tested only once.  A good company regularly does the cycle of Risk Identification, Prioritization, and Mitigation So should we in our personal life.  That is the Risk Management Cycle of Life! 

Ms. Tarriela is Chairman of Philippine National Bank.  She is a trustee of FINEX Foundation, former Undersecretary of Finance & Vice President of Citibank N.A.

 

 

 

 

August 10, 2010 STOCK MARKET PRIME FOR BULL RUN?

E-mail Print PDF

STOCK MARKET PRIME FOR BULL RUN?

 Do a New Trading System, the P-Noy ascendancy, Asia's unique global financial position today and a new PSE (Philippine Stock Exchange) president bring- like some good  feng shui- glad tidings for a possible stock market bull run towards year-end?
Last week, the PSE stock index breached the 3,500 mark and optimists in Cloud Nine are already seeing a bullish runaway towards year-end.

Read More
 

July 29, 2010 - EXPENSIVE MARINE LIFE IN PHILIPINES

E-mail Print PDF

EXPENSIVE MARINE LIFE IN PHILIPINES

 

Read More
 

July 23, 2010 - The Will to Change

E-mail Print PDF
The Will to Change

 

Read More
 


Page 1 of 4

Ads Space

Ads space. Ads space

Ads Space

Ads space. Ads space

Ads Space

Ads space. Ads space 


boxad2
 boxad2

 boxad3

 boxad3 boxad3 boxad3
Copyright © 2010 Financial Executives Institute of the Philippines (FINEX). All Rights Reserved.
Powered by Hive eMedia Werxz